Speed Test Statistics| « Back to speed test statistics |
Comporium CommunicationsSee: reviews and info for Comporium Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included | ||||||
| Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.9m/2.5m | Comporium Communications 12.9m/2.5m | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 20th 08:36 AM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 8.2m/464 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 07:41 AM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 6.3m/3.3m | Comporium Communications | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | California, USA | 21st 04:08 PM | Comporium Communications fftp.comporium.net | ||
| 4.4m/442 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Lancaster, SC, USA | California, USA | 28th 05:38 PM | Comporium Communications ln.dyn.cm.comporium.net | ||
| 4.3m/680 | Comporium Communications | anon | California, USA | 5th 12:47 AM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 4.1m/488 | Comporium Communications | anon | speedtest.cogeco.net | 31st 03:50 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 3.1m/455 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | California, USA | 15th 10:22 AM | Comporium Communications dyn.comporium.net | ||
| 3.1m/596 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 7th 11:33 AM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 3m/707 | Comporium Communications | anon | (flash speedtest) | 10th 11:52 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 2.5m/721 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Rock Hill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 5th 06:00 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 2.5m/2.9m | Comporium Communications | anon | California, USA | 12th 08:28 AM | Comporium Communications fftp.comporium.net | ||
| 2.3m/757 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Rock Hill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 5th 07:36 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 2.2m/477 | Comporium Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 02:42 PM | Comporium Communications rh3.dyn.cm.comporium.net | ||
| 2.2m/477 | Comporium Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 02:40 PM | Comporium Communications rh3.dyn.cm.comporium.net | ||
| 2.1m/329 | Comporium Communications | anon | (flash speedtest) | 19th 10:30 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 1.9m/481 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Fort Mill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 19th 02:37 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 1.8m/424 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Rock Hill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 7th 08:52 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 1.6m/215 | Comporium Communications 7m/7 | anon | (flash speedtest) | 19th 10:22 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 1.5m/410 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Heath Springs, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 19th 04:49 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 722/2.6m | Comporium Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 24th 07:59 PM | Comporium Communications dyn.fttp.comporium.net | ||
| 214/106 | Comporium Communications | anon @ Rock Hill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 31st 01:35 AM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| 71/259 | Comporium Communications 9/1 | anon @ Rock Hill, SC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 31st 02:25 PM | Comporium Communications comporium.net | ||
| disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. | |||||||